Drabble + Sanderson + very poor but early?? etch.

Discussion in 'Forum: Saw Identification and Discussion' started by fred0325, Nov 27, 2010.

  1. fred0325

    fred0325 Most Valued Member

    Messages:
    1,084
    Hello all,

    I bought this saw a couple of days ago mainly because of the flat handle, looked at it and put it to one side as I could see nothing on the blade. (It was cleaned already - unfortunately- to the extent that it is now).

    I was looking at it again today and caught the shadow of an etch, hence the photo's and this thread.

    I am wondering:-" Why stamp the back and etch the blade"? One of the explanations that I can come up with is that it was at the time when the company was either in the early days of etching as a practice or that they were experimenting with it. The handle would indicate (I think) an earlier rather than a later saw.

    Also below the "Drabble & Sanderson" "Sheffield" which is a simple etch that appears in the (I think Kelly's) 1901 Trade Marks Section there is a more ornate one. In the Whites 1879 Trade Index section there is no mark for Drabble and Sanderson and I have as yet found no intermediate or prior directories to look at with trade mark sections in them.

    If anyone has a saw with this etch on, I would like to see it, or as second best a printed trade mark containing the etch.

    Sorry about the quality of the pictures but the etch was very hard to photograph. I will try again at some stage in a different light.

    Does anyone know how I can enhance what etch is left without further damaging it?

    Hoping for some pics and advice

    Fred
     

    Attached Files:

  2. ray

    ray Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    671
    Hi Fred,

    I like Drabble and Sanderson, that's a nice example in great condition.

    The london flat handle and only two screws might make one think it's early, but I suspect that it might be a budget model.

    The etch means it's likely to be after 1850, but by the 1850's I would have thought normally to see 3 screws on a saw of that size.

    I think this just goes to highlight how tricky this saw dating business actually can become, there seems to be more exceptions than rules.

    I'm leaning towards a late 1800's lower cost model, rather than an early model.

    Either way it's a nice looking saw.

    Regards
    Ray